header-logo header-logo

25 January 2013
Issue: 7545 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Financial services

Arch Financial Products LLP and others v Financial Services Authority [2013] Lexis Citation 04, [2013] All ER (D) 67 (Jan)

There were no specific conditions that needed to be satisfied before the power in r 14(1) of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 (SI 2008/2698) could be exercised but it was subject to the overriding objective in r 2 of the rules which required the tribunal to deal with cases fairly and justly. The exercise of the power involved carrying out a balancing exercise between those factors that tended towards publication and those that would tend against. 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll