header-logo header-logo

Financially entwined

12 August 2010 / Matthew Snarr
Issue: 7430 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury , CPR
printer mail-detail

When is a financially interested party entitled to be joined to proceedings, asks Matthew Snarr

In Bottomley (by her litigation friend Helen Ryan) v East Midlands Strategic Health Authority [2010] EWCA Civ 756, [2010] All ER (D) 23 (Jul) the Court of Appeal considered the right of a local authority to be joined to proceedings involving a seriously injured claimant. The local authority wished to make representations as to the form of any settlement or judgment which was likely to significantly affect its own financial liabilities. In short, the case turned on whether or not the court ought to take into consideration the representations by a party who has a significant financial stake in the outcome of the decision to order periodical payments or a lump sum.  
 
The facts

The claimant was a 16-year-old girl who had suffered hypoxic ischemia resulting in brain damage and associated spastic quadriplegia arising out of the defendant’s negligent mismanagement of her birth. Liability was admitted. The claimant’s litigation friend was the local authority’s director of social care

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll