header-logo header-logo

Financially entwined

12 August 2010 / Matthew Snarr
Issue: 7430 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury , CPR
printer mail-detail

When is a financially interested party entitled to be joined to proceedings, asks Matthew Snarr

In Bottomley (by her litigation friend Helen Ryan) v East Midlands Strategic Health Authority [2010] EWCA Civ 756, [2010] All ER (D) 23 (Jul) the Court of Appeal considered the right of a local authority to be joined to proceedings involving a seriously injured claimant. The local authority wished to make representations as to the form of any settlement or judgment which was likely to significantly affect its own financial liabilities. In short, the case turned on whether or not the court ought to take into consideration the representations by a party who has a significant financial stake in the outcome of the decision to order periodical payments or a lump sum.  
 
The facts

The claimant was a 16-year-old girl who had suffered hypoxic ischemia resulting in brain damage and associated spastic quadriplegia arising out of the defendant’s negligent mismanagement of her birth. Liability was admitted. The claimant’s litigation friend was the local authority’s director of social care

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll