header-logo header-logo

12 August 2010 / Matthew Snarr
Issue: 7430 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury , CPR
printer mail-detail

Financially entwined

When is a financially interested party entitled to be joined to proceedings, asks Matthew Snarr

In Bottomley (by her litigation friend Helen Ryan) v East Midlands Strategic Health Authority [2010] EWCA Civ 756, [2010] All ER (D) 23 (Jul) the Court of Appeal considered the right of a local authority to be joined to proceedings involving a seriously injured claimant. The local authority wished to make representations as to the form of any settlement or judgment which was likely to significantly affect its own financial liabilities. In short, the case turned on whether or not the court ought to take into consideration the representations by a party who has a significant financial stake in the outcome of the decision to order periodical payments or a lump sum.  
 
The facts

The claimant was a 16-year-old girl who had suffered hypoxic ischemia resulting in brain damage and associated spastic quadriplegia arising out of the defendant’s negligent mismanagement of her birth. Liability was admitted. The claimant’s litigation friend was the local authority’s director of social

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll