header-logo header-logo

22 November 2013 / Chloe Carpenter
Issue: 7585 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Finding the energy

web_carpenter

Ofgem already has power to prevent non-transparent pricing mechanisms, Chloe Carpenter argues

On 27 August 2013, new standards of conduct imposed by energy market regulator Ofgem on energy suppliers came into force. These require suppliers to behave and carry out actions in a “fair, honest, transparent and appropriate manner”, provide information which is “complete, accurate and not misleading”, “communicated in plain and intelligible language” and which is “fair both in terms of its content and in terms of how it is presented”. The standards are backed by fines if necessary.

This is to be followed by other changes, including suppliers being limited to four “core” tariffs by the end of December 2013 (in the absence of any appeal to the Competition Commission from an energy company). It would seem that this further change is intended, in part, to eliminate so-called “multi-tier tariffs” whereby one energy company charges, eg, 10p per unit for the first 50 units, then 8p per unit for the next 100 units, then 6p per unit for the next 1000 units

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll