header-logo header-logo

22 November 2013 / Chloe Carpenter
Issue: 7585 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Finding the energy

web_carpenter

Ofgem already has power to prevent non-transparent pricing mechanisms, Chloe Carpenter argues

On 27 August 2013, new standards of conduct imposed by energy market regulator Ofgem on energy suppliers came into force. These require suppliers to behave and carry out actions in a “fair, honest, transparent and appropriate manner”, provide information which is “complete, accurate and not misleading”, “communicated in plain and intelligible language” and which is “fair both in terms of its content and in terms of how it is presented”. The standards are backed by fines if necessary.

This is to be followed by other changes, including suppliers being limited to four “core” tariffs by the end of December 2013 (in the absence of any appeal to the Competition Commission from an energy company). It would seem that this further change is intended, in part, to eliminate so-called “multi-tier tariffs” whereby one energy company charges, eg, 10p per unit for the first 50 units, then 8p per unit for the next 100 units, then 6p per unit for the next 1000 units

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll