header-logo header-logo

Finding the energy

22 November 2013 / Chloe Carpenter
Issue: 7585 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail
web_carpenter

Ofgem already has power to prevent non-transparent pricing mechanisms, Chloe Carpenter argues

On 27 August 2013, new standards of conduct imposed by energy market regulator Ofgem on energy suppliers came into force. These require suppliers to behave and carry out actions in a “fair, honest, transparent and appropriate manner”, provide information which is “complete, accurate and not misleading”, “communicated in plain and intelligible language” and which is “fair both in terms of its content and in terms of how it is presented”. The standards are backed by fines if necessary.

This is to be followed by other changes, including suppliers being limited to four “core” tariffs by the end of December 2013 (in the absence of any appeal to the Competition Commission from an energy company). It would seem that this further change is intended, in part, to eliminate so-called “multi-tier tariffs” whereby one energy company charges, eg, 10p per unit for the first 50 units, then 8p per unit for the next 100 units, then 6p per unit for the next 1000 units

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll