header-logo header-logo

22 November 2013 / Chloe Carpenter
Issue: 7585 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Finding the energy

web_carpenter

Ofgem already has power to prevent non-transparent pricing mechanisms, Chloe Carpenter argues

On 27 August 2013, new standards of conduct imposed by energy market regulator Ofgem on energy suppliers came into force. These require suppliers to behave and carry out actions in a “fair, honest, transparent and appropriate manner”, provide information which is “complete, accurate and not misleading”, “communicated in plain and intelligible language” and which is “fair both in terms of its content and in terms of how it is presented”. The standards are backed by fines if necessary.

This is to be followed by other changes, including suppliers being limited to four “core” tariffs by the end of December 2013 (in the absence of any appeal to the Competition Commission from an energy company). It would seem that this further change is intended, in part, to eliminate so-called “multi-tier tariffs” whereby one energy company charges, eg, 10p per unit for the first 50 units, then 8p per unit for the next 100 units, then 6p per unit for the next 1000 units

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll