header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

A fine distinction

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
16 September 2010 / Jane Ching
Issue: 7433 / Categories: Features , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

Is becoming a paralegal a safer move to qualification? Jane Ching investigates

There has been a dramatic increase in the number of paralegals working in the legal sector at the same time as the market has seen a hardening in decisions by law firms to award training contracts. Meanwhile the Law Society has announced a scoping study into qualifications for paralegals. ILEX Tutorial College offers elements of its legal executive qualification route to those wishing to become paralegals and the Open University provides NVQs in Legal Advice.

At the same time, the SRA has developed desired outcomes for the period of work-based learning proposed to replace the training contract and for “day one” of a solicitor’s career; Skills for Justice offers a series of National Occupational Standards for Legal Advice and the Institute of Paralegals promotes a series of competence frameworks specifically for paralegals.

Attention

So, why this increasing focus on paralegals? Who are all these “paralegals”; what are they qualified to do and does the “para” in paralegal mean “side by side”

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Firm strengthens catastrophic injury capability with partner promotions

DWF—Dean Gormley

DWF—Dean Gormley

Finance and restructuring team offering expands in Manchester with partner hire

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Firm announces appointment of head of remortgage

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Employment law’s fine margins
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
NLJ this week: Promises broken on non-molestation orders?
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
NLJ this week: Assisted dying under the legal microscope
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
NLJ this week: Failure to deliver in Getty v Stability AI
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
NLJ this week: Spotlight on the Supreme Court in 2025
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll