header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
16 September 2010 / Jane Ching
Issue: 7433 / Categories: Features , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

A fine distinction

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Is becoming a paralegal a safer move to qualification? Jane Ching investigates

There has been a dramatic increase in the number of paralegals working in the legal sector at the same time as the market has seen a hardening in decisions by law firms to award training contracts. Meanwhile the Law Society has announced a scoping study into qualifications for paralegals. ILEX Tutorial College offers elements of its legal executive qualification route to those wishing to become paralegals and the Open University provides NVQs in Legal Advice.

At the same time, the SRA has developed desired outcomes for the period of work-based learning proposed to replace the training contract and for “day one” of a solicitor’s career; Skills for Justice offers a series of National Occupational Standards for Legal Advice and the Institute of Paralegals promotes a series of competence frameworks specifically for paralegals.

Attention

So, why this increasing focus on paralegals? Who are all these “paralegals”; what are they qualified to do and does the “para” in paralegal mean “side by side”

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Birketts—Nathan Evans

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Commercial and technology team in Cambridge strengthened by partner hire

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Hampshire firm appoints head of new family department

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Firm strengthens securities practice with partner return

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Mazur and more—inside the litigation frontline

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

NLJ this week: Social media bans for children spark legal dilemmas
Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
NLJ this week: Leasehold reform risks creating ‘forgotten freeholders’
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
NLJ this week: Court of Appeal clarifies when a claim truly begins
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
NLJ this week: Split FDRs could ease pressure—and boost settlements
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll