header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

A fine distinction

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
16 September 2010 / Jane Ching
Issue: 7433 / Categories: Features , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

Is becoming a paralegal a safer move to qualification? Jane Ching investigates

There has been a dramatic increase in the number of paralegals working in the legal sector at the same time as the market has seen a hardening in decisions by law firms to award training contracts. Meanwhile the Law Society has announced a scoping study into qualifications for paralegals. ILEX Tutorial College offers elements of its legal executive qualification route to those wishing to become paralegals and the Open University provides NVQs in Legal Advice.

At the same time, the SRA has developed desired outcomes for the period of work-based learning proposed to replace the training contract and for “day one” of a solicitor’s career; Skills for Justice offers a series of National Occupational Standards for Legal Advice and the Institute of Paralegals promotes a series of competence frameworks specifically for paralegals.

Attention

So, why this increasing focus on paralegals? Who are all these “paralegals”; what are they qualified to do and does the “para” in paralegal mean “side by side”

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Commercial disputes practice bolstered by partner hire

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

London competition team expands with collective actions specialist hire

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Commercial dispute resolution team in London welcomes partner

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: What judging really demands
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
NLJ this week: AI comes for the billable hour
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
NLJ this week: Civil procedure—sharp elbows & sharper warnings
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
NLJ this week: Getting the facts right in family courts
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
NLJ this week: Sporting justice—at sprint speed
As the Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina, legal disputes are once again being resolved almost as fast as the athletes compete. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS's) ad hoc divisions, which can decide cases within 24 hours
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll