header-logo header-logo

05 September 2013
Issue: 7574 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Fire brigade

"Wembridge Claimants” and others v Winter and another [2013] EWHC 2331 (QB), [2013] All ER (D) 04 (Aug)

Properly construed, under the Fire and Rescue Services Act 2004, the “health and safety regulations” could amend a duty under existing statutory provisions and, thus, breach of health and safety regulations would be actionable, save where the contrary was expressly excluded. Fire and rescue services had not been expressly excluded from the Act. Further, there was no necessary implication that no civil liability arose, either at common law or by the imposition of regulation, because the Act contained “target duties” only.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll