header-logo header-logo

23 November 2011
Issue: 7491 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Firms lose out in family bid

Family lawyers group Resolution has criticised the Legal Services Commission (LSC) bidding process after one in 10 family law legal aid firms lost its contract.

In September firms bid for new contracts to run family and family and housing legal aid services, due to start early in 2012. Every law firm that applied had heard back by the beginning of this week.

According to initial LSC analysis, 92% of applicants have been awarded a contract.

David Emmerson, chairman of Resolution’s legal aid committee, says: “It is a considerable surprise that so many applicants for the tender failed in what was a non-competitive bid.

“There were none of the quality criteria and panel membership issues that distinguished firms in the failed 2010 tender. It is understood that almost all failures relate to technical issues, but it would be terrible to lose fundamentally good firms from public service on the basis of simple errors.”

Emmerson queries the number of questions within the bid process which “appeared unneccessary” and hopes that issues can be resolved through the appeals process. The eTendering portal by which firms applied for the legal aid contract was “an unneccessarily frustrating hurdle”, he adds. He expressed sympathy for those who work in and rely upon those organisations that failed in the bid.

 

Issue: 7491 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll