header-logo header-logo

Firms lose out in family bid

23 November 2011
Issue: 7491 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Family lawyers group Resolution has criticised the Legal Services Commission (LSC) bidding process after one in 10 family law legal aid firms lost its contract.

In September firms bid for new contracts to run family and family and housing legal aid services, due to start early in 2012. Every law firm that applied had heard back by the beginning of this week.

According to initial LSC analysis, 92% of applicants have been awarded a contract.

David Emmerson, chairman of Resolution’s legal aid committee, says: “It is a considerable surprise that so many applicants for the tender failed in what was a non-competitive bid.

“There were none of the quality criteria and panel membership issues that distinguished firms in the failed 2010 tender. It is understood that almost all failures relate to technical issues, but it would be terrible to lose fundamentally good firms from public service on the basis of simple errors.”

Emmerson queries the number of questions within the bid process which “appeared unneccessary” and hopes that issues can be resolved through the appeals process. The eTendering portal by which firms applied for the legal aid contract was “an unneccessarily frustrating hurdle”, he adds. He expressed sympathy for those who work in and rely upon those organisations that failed in the bid.

 

Issue: 7491 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll