header-logo header-logo

First sentencing guidelines for modern slavery

12 August 2021
Categories: Legal News , Criminal , In Court , Human rights
printer mail-detail
Guidelines on sentencing modern slavery offences have been published today

The Sentencing Council said the new guidelines would cover four offences under the Modern Slavery Act 2015. They will apply to: holding someone in slavery, servitude or forced labour; human trafficking, transporting people for purposes of exploitation; committing an offence with the intention of committing a human trafficking offence; and breach of a slavery and trafficking prevention order or a slavery and trafficking risk order.

The Sentencing Council has published its first set of guidelines for offences under the Modern Slavery Act 2015, including up to 18 years in prison for offenders in a leading role, who expect substantial advantage and who expose victims to an extremely high risk of death.

The guidelines, which must be followed unless the court finds it contrary to the interests of justice to do so, come into effect on 1 October. They apply to: holding someone in slavery, servitude or forced labour; human trafficking, transporting people for purposes of exploitation; committing an offence with the intention of committing a human trafficking offence; and breach of a slavery and trafficking prevention order or a slavery and trafficking risk order.

The guidelines recognise the impact of coercion on victims―offenders coerced or intimidated into committing these offences or who are themselves victims will have that fact recognised by the courts and could receive comparatively low sentences. The guidelines note the harm caused to victims may not always be obvious and direct courts to consider all the facts of the case even where a victim is unwilling or unable to give evidence.

Human trafficking usually concerns recruiting, harbouring, receiving or transferring people across borders but can also be domestic, such as county lines trafficking and sexual assault.

The guidance proposes an uplift of two years on sentences where offenders have committed an offence to facilitate a trafficking offence. However, judges can impose up to ten years or, where the underlying offence is kidnapping or false imprisonment, life sentences.

Sentencing Council member, Rosina Cottage QC said: ‘Offending can take place over a long period of time, sometimes for years, and these new guidelines take account not only of the actions by the offender, but the impact on the victim.

‘Offending can range from large-scale operations, with substantial financial gain, to offences carried out by offenders who are themselves victims either through coercion and intimidation and the sentencing range has been developed to reflect this.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Fox & Partners—Nikki Edwards

Fox & Partners—Nikki Edwards

Employment boutique strengthens litigation bench with partner hire

Mourant—Benjamin Manchak, Jessica Vickers & Stefan Chinniah

Mourant—Benjamin Manchak, Jessica Vickers & Stefan Chinniah

Firm promotes trio to partner across Channel Islands and Cayman Islands

Switalskis—Rifat Shahid, Alesha Kang & Emelia Garnett

Switalskis—Rifat Shahid, Alesha Kang & Emelia Garnett

Child care teams expands in Bradford and York with three appointments

NEWS
Law students and graduates can now apply to qualify as solicitors and barristers with the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS)
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll