header-logo header-logo

29 May 2026 / Sarah Bunn
Issue: 8163 / Categories: Opinion , Abuse , Family , Divorce , Child law
printer mail-detail

Five years on: The Domestic Abuse Act

251071
© Getty images
Progress or missed promise? Sarah Bunn considers the practical impact of the Act & the persistence of ‘pro-contact culture’ in the family court

It has been five years since the Domestic Abuse Act 2021 (DAA 2021) came into force on 30 April 2021. This anniversary offers an opportunity for both reflection and reckoning.

When DAA 2021 was passed, it was hailed as a landmark piece of legislation—one that would transform the family court’s treatment of cases involving domestic abuse. However, the ‘Everyday Business’ report, published by the Domestic Abuse Commissioner in October 2025, suggests that the Act has failed to effect practical change and that systemic issues regarding the treatment of domestic abuse in the family court remain.

This article revisits the core legislative changes brought about by DAA 2021 and explores the findings in the Everyday Business report, focusing particularly on the alleged ‘pro-contact culture’ in the family court. It also considers the next steps and how these could pave the way for change.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll