header-logo header-logo

29 May 2026 / Sarah Bunn
Issue: 8163 / Categories: Opinion , Abuse , Family , Divorce , Child law
printer mail-detail

Five years on: The Domestic Abuse Act

251071
© Getty images
Progress or missed promise? Sarah Bunn considers the practical impact of the Act & the persistence of ‘pro-contact culture’ in the family court

It has been five years since the Domestic Abuse Act 2021 (DAA 2021) came into force on 30 April 2021. This anniversary offers an opportunity for both reflection and reckoning.

When DAA 2021 was passed, it was hailed as a landmark piece of legislation—one that would transform the family court’s treatment of cases involving domestic abuse. However, the ‘Everyday Business’ report, published by the Domestic Abuse Commissioner in October 2025, suggests that the Act has failed to effect practical change and that systemic issues regarding the treatment of domestic abuse in the family court remain.

This article revisits the core legislative changes brought about by DAA 2021 and explores the findings in the Everyday Business report, focusing particularly on the alleged ‘pro-contact culture’ in the family court. It also considers the next steps and how these could pave the way for change.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll