header-logo header-logo

29 June 2012 / Jon Holbrook
Issue: 7520 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property , Housing
printer mail-detail

In a fix?

75461397_fmt_4

In the first of two articles, Jon Holbrook considers the new local authority flexible tenancy scheme

“It is no longer right that the government should require every social tenancy to be for life.” So said the Housing Minister, Grant Shapps MP, in November 2010, in a consultation document on the future of social housing. Eighteen months later the Localism Act 2011 (LA 2011) came into force to enable local authority landlords to grant flexible tenancies which, unlike the existing periodic secure tenancy, will give the landlord a mandatory right of possession. The flexible tenancy need only be for a minimum period of two years.

Fixed-term tenancies should, if local authorities and housing associations grant them, have a profound effect on the sector. The government has made clear its objective of ensuring that social housing is “available for those who genuinely need it” by giving landlords more control over who remains in social housing so that there can be a better match between need and provision.

LA 2011 amends the Housing Act

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll