header-logo header-logo

Fixing family law: a wish list

10 January 2019 / David Burrows
Issue: 7823 / Categories: Opinion , Divorce , Child law , Mediation , Family
printer mail-detail
nlj_7823_burrows

David Burrows looks ahead & shares his manifesto for change

What would I do if I ruled the family law world? I have started from recognition that opaque law is injustice in itself, and ended with a plea for legal aid (I have not included domestic abuse law reform since that is said to be in the course of being dealt with). My pleas for reform of family law reform would include the following:

1. Clarity: lack of clarity in law denies a fair trial, especially in these days of so many people being deprived of legal aid (see later). Family law is no exception. Parliament has fixed the rule-makers’ duty as to produce rules ‘with a view to securing that… the rules are both simple and simply expressed’ (Courts Act 2003 s 75(5)). Frequently this is not achieved by the rules: for example, much of Pt 16 (representation of children) is a repetition, with convoluted and confusing complexity, of the 1991 rules (see later); FPR 2010 Pt

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—Tim Foley

Winckworth Sherwood—Tim Foley

Property litigation practice strengthened by partner hire

Kingsley Napley—Romilly Holland

Kingsley Napley—Romilly Holland

International arbitration team specialist joins the team

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Set creates new client and business development role amid growth

NEWS
The rank of King’s Counsel (KC) has been awarded to 96 barristers, and no solicitors, in the latest silk round
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
back-to-top-scroll