header-logo header-logo

Fixing family law: a wish list

10 January 2019 / David Burrows
Issue: 7823 / Categories: Opinion , Divorce , Child law , Mediation , Family
printer mail-detail
nlj_7823_burrows

David Burrows looks ahead & shares his manifesto for change

What would I do if I ruled the family law world? I have started from recognition that opaque law is injustice in itself, and ended with a plea for legal aid (I have not included domestic abuse law reform since that is said to be in the course of being dealt with). My pleas for reform of family law reform would include the following:

1. Clarity: lack of clarity in law denies a fair trial, especially in these days of so many people being deprived of legal aid (see later). Family law is no exception. Parliament has fixed the rule-makers’ duty as to produce rules ‘with a view to securing that… the rules are both simple and simply expressed’ (Courts Act 2003 s 75(5)). Frequently this is not achieved by the rules: for example, much of Pt 16 (representation of children) is a repetition, with convoluted and confusing complexity, of the 1991 rules (see later); FPR 2010

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll