header-logo header-logo

Fixing family law: a wish list

10 January 2019 / David Burrows
Issue: 7823 / Categories: Opinion , Divorce , Child law , Mediation , Family
printer mail-detail
nlj_7823_burrows

David Burrows looks ahead & shares his manifesto for change

What would I do if I ruled the family law world? I have started from recognition that opaque law is injustice in itself, and ended with a plea for legal aid (I have not included domestic abuse law reform since that is said to be in the course of being dealt with). My pleas for reform of family law reform would include the following:

1. Clarity: lack of clarity in law denies a fair trial, especially in these days of so many people being deprived of legal aid (see later). Family law is no exception. Parliament has fixed the rule-makers’ duty as to produce rules ‘with a view to securing that… the rules are both simple and simply expressed’ (Courts Act 2003 s 75(5)). Frequently this is not achieved by the rules: for example, much of Pt 16 (representation of children) is a repetition, with convoluted and confusing complexity, of the 1991 rules (see later); FPR 2010

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll