header-logo header-logo

22 September 2017
Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Flexible hours pilot postponed

The controversial flexible court hours pilot has been postponed until February, HM Courts & Tribunals Services (HMCTS) has confirmed.

The pilot, which would have involved courts sitting as early as 8am and as late as 8pm, had been due to start in certain magistrates’, Crown, civil and family courts over the next six weeks. However, the proposal came under fire from barristers and solicitors concerned about the impact on their working hours. In particular, the Bar Council expressed concern that the early starts and late finishes would act as a barrier to practitioners with caring responsibilities.  

Susan Acland-Hood, CEO of HMCTS, said: ‘The strong views expressed reinforce the need for us to proceed on a clear evidence base.

‘It’s for that reason that, today, we have agreed to delay the start of these pilots until we are satisfied that we have a robust, independent evaluation system in place; and until we have taken more time to engage and discuss the pilots, picking up on comments made on how they could be improved.’

She said HMCTS would re-tender for an independent organisation to lead the evaluation work, at the same time making more information available and spending more time consulting with professionals in each jurisdiction, including those outside the pilot areas.

Andrew Langdon QC, Chair of the Bar, said: ‘Whilst plans for flexible courts have not been dropped, it is encouraging to see HMCTS not only take on board the Bar Council’s concerns about the plans, which include the impact they will have on barristers with child and other care responsibilities, but they also commit to ensuring robust evaluation measures are in place before proceeding with the pilot.

‘Past experience shows that rushing into decisions can backfire on the government, employment tribunal fees and the impact of LASPO on vulnerable people being just two examples. We will continue to talk with HMCTS, who are in listening mode, on this issue.’

Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll