header-logo header-logo

13 October 2016
Issue: 7718 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Flexible working is a winner

Clients could gain a competitive advantage by introducing flexible working practices, employment lawyers have been told.

The right to request flexible working was extended in 2014 to all employees with six months’ service. However, it remains significantly under-used as a work benefit, according to new research by flexible working advocate organisations, My Family Care and Hydrogen, launched at Norton Rose Fulbright’s London offices this week.

The research, The competitive advantage of flexible and family friendly working, is based on a survey of 1,587 employees and 310 employers. It found that more than half of the working population wanted the opportunity to work remotely or from home but only one third were encouraged to do so, with many respondents expressing concern about the stigma around it. Similarly, 63% of people would like to have flexible start and finish times but only 37% actually enjoy this benefit.

Flexible working is the top benefit cited by people looking for a new job. Four out of five look for flexible working options before joining a company.

Issue: 7718 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll