header-logo header-logo

05 February 2010 / Rodney Gardner
Issue: 7403 / Categories: Opinion , Public
printer mail-detail

The floodgates close

The High Court handed down a series of judgments at the tail end of last year relating to various issues affecting the enforceability of consumer credit loans

The High Court handed down a series of judgments at the tail end of last year relating to various issues affecting the enforceability of consumer credit loans (see Carey v HSBC Bank plc and other cases [2009] EWHC 3417 (QB), [2010] All ER (D) 05 (Feb)). The issues falling for determination were preliminary matters of law concerning requests for copies of credit card agreements pursuant to s 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA 1974). The judgment, however, is equally appropriate for requests pursuant to s 77 of the Act (Fixed Sum Loan Agreements) and s 79 of the Act (Hire Agreements).

Judge Waksman QC, sitting as a High Court judge, has done a great service in identifying the issues and in giving rulings and guidance, which in my view at least, are unimpeachable. My understanding is that the several claimants, all being consumers seeking to challenge

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll