header-logo header-logo

Football hooliganism rates rise

25 October 2007
Issue: 7294 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

News

The government is claiming success in its fight against football violence despite the overall number of fans being arrested last season increasing for the first time since 2003-04.

Figures released by the Home Office last week show there were 2,833 football related arrests at league matches, up from 2,673 in 2005-06. More than 3,000 known troublemakers are also subject to football banning orders.
Home Office Minister Vernon Coaker says he is encouraged by the effective use of banning orders—since 2000, 94% of individuals whose orders have expired are “assessed by the police and courts” as no longer posing a risk of football disorder. However, Paul Firth, a retired judge, says: “Mr Coaker mentions ‘the police and courts’, as if to add legitimacy to his claim that the orders are effective. What he omits is the legislative presumption in favour of long banning orders against individuals whom many of us in the courts never perceived as ‘posing a risk of football violence’ in the first place.”
The figures also show an increase in the number of arrests for missile throwing from 68 in 2005-06 to 97 in 2006-07. Firth suggests that this figure is far too low.

“I find it hard to go along with the view that whenever the number of arrests for a particular offence rises, the increase is attributable to a ‘tougher police approach’; but when the arrest figure falls, this is ‘great progress’,” he says.

Issue: 7294 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll