header-logo header-logo

Football hooliganism rates rise

25 October 2007
Issue: 7294 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

News

The government is claiming success in its fight against football violence despite the overall number of fans being arrested last season increasing for the first time since 2003-04.

Figures released by the Home Office last week show there were 2,833 football related arrests at league matches, up from 2,673 in 2005-06. More than 3,000 known troublemakers are also subject to football banning orders.
Home Office Minister Vernon Coaker says he is encouraged by the effective use of banning orders—since 2000, 94% of individuals whose orders have expired are “assessed by the police and courts” as no longer posing a risk of football disorder. However, Paul Firth, a retired judge, says: “Mr Coaker mentions ‘the police and courts’, as if to add legitimacy to his claim that the orders are effective. What he omits is the legislative presumption in favour of long banning orders against individuals whom many of us in the courts never perceived as ‘posing a risk of football violence’ in the first place.”
The figures also show an increase in the number of arrests for missile throwing from 68 in 2005-06 to 97 in 2006-07. Firth suggests that this figure is far too low.

“I find it hard to go along with the view that whenever the number of arrests for a particular offence rises, the increase is attributable to a ‘tougher police approach’; but when the arrest figure falls, this is ‘great progress’,” he says.

Issue: 7294 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll