header-logo header-logo

Forgotten defenders

08 November 2007 / Andrew Tucker , Andrew Buckham
Issue: 7296 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Are we failing our armed forces? ask Andrew Buckham and Andrew Tucker

The scale of compensation payable to injured service personnel under the Armed Forces Compensation Scheme (AFCS) is under scrutiny after details of the case of Lance Bombardier Ben Parkinson were highlighted by the media. Ben, aged 24, a soldier serving on an operational tour in Afghanistan, sustained multiple injuries as a result of a mine strike. Ben submitted an application under AFCS, a scheme described by the Ministry of Defence (MoD) on its introduction in 2005 as a scheme that “gives modern, fair and simpler arrangements, which focuses help better on the more severely disabled”.

However, the award of £152,150 afforded to Ben under AFCS highlighted that there are significant problems in the way in which the scheme assesses compensation for service personnel who have suffered multiple injuries, and that the scheme needed to be urgently reviewed. Ben’s case has also brought into sharp focus the commitment and sacrifice members of the British armed forces make, what they may expect to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll