header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
03 February 2012 / Geraldine Morris
Issue: 7499 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Forward thinking

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Family lawyers must adapt to survive in the year ahead, says Geraldine Morris

Last year was a challenging year for family lawyers and in 2012 there are many more challenges ahead. This may be the year that the practice of family law changes beyond all recognition and lawyers who do not adapt may not survive in a climate of new competition and the continuing economic downturn.

Cuts

With the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) looking to make inroads into the £2bn of savings it must make overall, 40% of courts have or will be closed and staff levels slashed with an estimated 15,000 jobs lost—one third of the total staff employed by the MoJ. Combined with the anticipated cuts to legal aid as a result of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill (currently slowly navigating its way through Parliament), the challenge will be how to tackle a much reduced court service burdened with increasing numbers of litigants in person.

ADR

The Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010), which came

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Policing the safeguards when appointing trust corporations
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
NLJ this week: What the court considers when assessing refusal of ADR
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
NLJ this week: Finding innovative ways to fund the justice gap
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Two’s company, but three’s a crowd in financial provision cases
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
Charities Appeals Supplement: March 2026
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll