header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
10 March 2011
Issue: 7456 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Foster parents—Approval of prospective foster parents by local authority— Homosexuality

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

R (Johns and another) v Derby City Council (Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening) [2011] EWHC 375 (Admin), [2011] All ER (D) 292 (Feb)

Queen’s Bench Division, Administrative Court (London), Munby LJ and Beatson J, 28 Feb 2011

A local authority is entitled to take into account prospective foster parents’ views on same-sex relationships.

Paul Diamond (instructed by Camerons Solicitors LLP) for the claimants. Jeremy Weston (instructed by Derby City Council, Legal Services) for the authority. Karon Monaghan QC (instructed by the Equality and Human Rights Commission) for the commission.

The claimants, a husband and wife, were members of the Pentacostalist Church and believed that sexual relations other than those within marriage between one man and one woman were morally wrong. They applied to the defendant local authority for approval to be short-term foster carers. They underwent a number of assessments as concerns had been raised that their views on homosexuality and other religions did not accord with the diversity requirements for foster carers, in accordance with the national

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll