header-logo header-logo

07 April 2017 / Dr Tony Harvey
Issue: 7741 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

The fourth & final act?

nlj_7741_harvey

Dr Tony Harvey examines the new draft money-laundering regulations

Following a Treasury consultation that ended in November 2016, the government has now published new draft anti-money laundering regulations.

The Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 will take effect on 26 June 2017 and will replace entirely the current Money Laundering Regulations 2007 (SI 2007/2157).

The new regulations implement the Fourth EU Money Laundering Directive and the Fund Transfer Regulation. This is the fourth attempt by the EU to try to crack down on money laundered through criminal activity involving drugs, prostitution, slavery, racketeering, arms and, in particular, terrorism. It is estimated that these criminal activities are worth over £350bn worldwide annually.

The new regulations will attempt to ensure that the UK’s anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing regime is kept up to date, is effective and is proportionate.

Many of the provisions of the 2007 AML Regulations are repeated and will be familiar to legal compliance teams but there are some significant and important changes

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll