header-logo header-logo

11 February 2010 / Mark Sharpley
Issue: 7404 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Fraud awareness

Mark Sharpley suggests how to prevent fraudulent activity

Whenever there are pressures on a business, and solicitors’ practices are no exception, there are opportunities for fraud for those who are unprepared or unaware. Fraud within a legal practice can arise from three directions:
l  staff working operating without proper supervision or control;
l fee earners and partners working under duress; and
l clients who take advantage.

Clever fraudsters can be adept at covering their tracks. To counter this the Law Society, by continuing to improve the Solicitors’ Accounts Rules (SAR) controls covering good practice requirements for the proper control of client money endeavours to give quality guidance which, when followed, actively discourages fraudulent activity.

This certainly reduces the likelihood of internal fraud of both fee earners and other staff but it is important that principals and owners monitor the controls and ensure compliance is reviewed on a regular basis, either by the practice manager, a suitably qualified individual or external reporting accountants. There is no excuse for negligence when, or if, a firm does not regularly control the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll