header-logo header-logo

11 February 2010 / Mark Sharpley
Issue: 7404 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Fraud awareness

Mark Sharpley suggests how to prevent fraudulent activity

Whenever there are pressures on a business, and solicitors’ practices are no exception, there are opportunities for fraud for those who are unprepared or unaware. Fraud within a legal practice can arise from three directions:
l  staff working operating without proper supervision or control;
l fee earners and partners working under duress; and
l clients who take advantage.

Clever fraudsters can be adept at covering their tracks. To counter this the Law Society, by continuing to improve the Solicitors’ Accounts Rules (SAR) controls covering good practice requirements for the proper control of client money endeavours to give quality guidance which, when followed, actively discourages fraudulent activity.

This certainly reduces the likelihood of internal fraud of both fee earners and other staff but it is important that principals and owners monitor the controls and ensure compliance is reviewed on a regular basis, either by the practice manager, a suitably qualified individual or external reporting accountants. There is no excuse for negligence when, or if, a firm does not regularly control the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll