header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
24 November 2023 / Rakesh Kapila
Issue: 8050 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Fraudulent trading: a forensic accountant’s perspective

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
147351
Rakesh Kapila considers the financial aspects of fraudulent trading
  • Types of fraudulent trading.
  • Information to be examined.
  • Issues relating to the financial position of the business.

A person commits the offence of fraudulent trading if he or she is knowingly party to the carrying on of a business either with intent to defraud creditors or for any other fraudulent purpose. Although defendants in fraudulent trading cases are often company directors, the Fraud Act 2006 extended the scope of the offence to include sole traders and partners. The offence may ‘catch’ professional advisers acting in executive roles.

Fraudulent trading occurs when a business continues to trade at a time when there is, to the knowledge of the business’s management, no reasonable prospect of creditors ever receiving payment. This includes a situation in which there are no good grounds for thinking that the business can pay its debts even if its management considers that it can. The standard is objective.

In order to appreciate the types of fraudulent trading and the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll