header-logo header-logo

24 November 2023 / Rakesh Kapila
Issue: 8050 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Fraudulent trading: a forensic accountant’s perspective

147351
Rakesh Kapila considers the financial aspects of fraudulent trading
  • Types of fraudulent trading.
  • Information to be examined.
  • Issues relating to the financial position of the business.

A person commits the offence of fraudulent trading if he or she is knowingly party to the carrying on of a business either with intent to defraud creditors or for any other fraudulent purpose. Although defendants in fraudulent trading cases are often company directors, the Fraud Act 2006 extended the scope of the offence to include sole traders and partners. The offence may ‘catch’ professional advisers acting in executive roles.

Fraudulent trading occurs when a business continues to trade at a time when there is, to the knowledge of the business’s management, no reasonable prospect of creditors ever receiving payment. This includes a situation in which there are no good grounds for thinking that the business can pay its debts even if its management considers that it can. The standard is objective.

In order to appreciate the types of fraudulent trading and the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll