header-logo header-logo

24 November 2023 / Rakesh Kapila
Issue: 8050 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Fraudulent trading: a forensic accountant’s perspective

147351
Rakesh Kapila considers the financial aspects of fraudulent trading
  • Types of fraudulent trading.
  • Information to be examined.
  • Issues relating to the financial position of the business.

A person commits the offence of fraudulent trading if he or she is knowingly party to the carrying on of a business either with intent to defraud creditors or for any other fraudulent purpose. Although defendants in fraudulent trading cases are often company directors, the Fraud Act 2006 extended the scope of the offence to include sole traders and partners. The offence may ‘catch’ professional advisers acting in executive roles.

Fraudulent trading occurs when a business continues to trade at a time when there is, to the knowledge of the business’s management, no reasonable prospect of creditors ever receiving payment. This includes a situation in which there are no good grounds for thinking that the business can pay its debts even if its management considers that it can. The standard is objective.

In order to appreciate the types of fraudulent trading and the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Heather Gibson

Freeths—Heather Gibson

Freeths strengthens national tax team with Heather Gibson appointment

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll