header-logo header-logo

Free-wheeling curbed

06 September 2007 / Seamus Burns
Issue: 7287 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

The requirement to give advance notice of mass cycle rides is a worrying incursion on civil liberties, says Seamus Burns

Since 1994, cyclists have gathered near the National Film Theatre on the South Bank, London, at a set time early in the evening of the last Friday of each month for a mass ride through the streets of London, dubbed “Critical Mass”, with 100 to 400 cyclists taking part. Those features of the cycle ride are fixed, but the route is not. Since 1994 over 150 monthly mass cycle rides have taken place.

The Metropolitan Police commissioner had unsuccessfully argued in the Divisional Court, comprised of Lord Justice Sedley and Mr Justice Gray (see Kay v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [2006] EWHC 1536 (Admin), [2006] All ER (D) 304 (Jun)) that the cycle rides were processions which the organisers were required to give the police advance notice of under the Public Order Act 1986 (POA 1986), s 11 and that the organisers had failed to do this.

However, the Divisional Court held that the monthly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll