header-logo header-logo

Fresh ground?

08 February 2013 / Andrew Parker
Issue: 7547 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services
printer mail-detail

The legal profession needs to wake up and smell the coffee, warns Andrew Parker

Three years ago I warned in these pages that the broad recommendations of the Jackson Review of Civil Litigation Costs would be delivered (“Access all areas”, 160 NLJ 7408, p 366). In March 2011, the coalition government published the outline of its plans based on the report and, in May 2012, the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 received the Royal Assent.

April in the offing

The planned implementation date of 1 April 2013 has been public knowledge since at least July 2012—it was certainly in the minds of the Court of Appeal when it delivered the initial decision in Simmons v Castle [2012] EWCA Civ 1039, [2012] All ER (D) 335 (Jul). The new Master of the Rolls, Lord Dyson, stated unequivocally to the Law Society’s Civil Litigation Conference in October that the rules would be in place for 1 April 2013.

However, recent coverage suggests that many lawyers are only now beginning to accept

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll