header-logo header-logo

22 May 2015
Issue: 7653 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

The friendly approach

nlj_7653_myers

Blood is not necessarily thicker than water where will validity is concerned, observes Emma Myers

Pensioner, Ronald Butcher, left more than a monetary legacy when he died. The challenge to his decision to change his will late in the day cutting out family members in favour of someone who’d done him a good turn has highlighted important issues around validating wills and the court’s attitude relatives’ claims.

Seventy-five-year-old Mr Butcher, a bachelor from Enfield in north London, changed his will to disinherit his cousin and two family friends, instead leaving his entire £500,000 estate to a builder who had reportedly cleaned his gutter for free.

The earlier beneficiaries claimed that Mr Butcher did not know and approve of the will’s contents. However, their inability to provide evidence to support this led the court to uphold the will in favour of builder Daniel Bryan Sharp.

Mr Butcher and Mr Sharp met in 2009 and remained friends after the original gutter-clearing job. Mr Sharp of Welling, Kent, would look in on the pensioner whenever he was in the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll