header-logo header-logo

22 May 2015
Issue: 7653 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

The friendly approach

nlj_7653_myers

Blood is not necessarily thicker than water where will validity is concerned, observes Emma Myers

Pensioner, Ronald Butcher, left more than a monetary legacy when he died. The challenge to his decision to change his will late in the day cutting out family members in favour of someone who’d done him a good turn has highlighted important issues around validating wills and the court’s attitude relatives’ claims.

Seventy-five-year-old Mr Butcher, a bachelor from Enfield in north London, changed his will to disinherit his cousin and two family friends, instead leaving his entire £500,000 estate to a builder who had reportedly cleaned his gutter for free.

The earlier beneficiaries claimed that Mr Butcher did not know and approve of the will’s contents. However, their inability to provide evidence to support this led the court to uphold the will in favour of builder Daniel Bryan Sharp.

Mr Butcher and Mr Sharp met in 2009 and remained friends after the original gutter-clearing job. Mr Sharp of Welling, Kent, would look in on the pensioner whenever he was in the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll