header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
24 March 2023 / Maria Nizzero
Issue: 8018 / Categories: Features , International justice , Sanctions , Rule of law
printer mail-detail

Sanctioned assets: from freeze, to seize, to Kyiv?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
115856
Maria Nizzero sets out the complexities of possibly using seized sanctions assets to fund reconstruction in Ukraine
  • The imposition of sanctions has triggered a policy conversation about the potential for permanent confiscation of assets that are currently temporarily frozen under sanctions.
  • However, there are inherent limitations in using sanctions as the basis for permanent asset deprivation.
  • The response to Russian illicit finance should consider short-term and long-term foreign policy goals and desired criminal justice outcomes, and be delimited within the boundaries of the law.

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 has prompted an unprecedented surge in sanctions-based asset freezes directed at individuals linked to the Russian government. One year on from the invasion, the EU, the UK and the US all announced new packages of sanctions against Kremlin-linked individuals and those who supported its unlawful aggression against Ukraine.

The assets frozen under sanctions are passive and cannot be retrieved. There is a risk, if sanctions measures are dropped as a condition for ending

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll