header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Sanctioned assets: from freeze, to seize, to Kyiv?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
24 March 2023 / Maria Nizzero
Issue: 8018 / Categories: Features , International justice , Sanctions , Rule of law
printer mail-detail
115856
Maria Nizzero sets out the complexities of possibly using seized sanctions assets to fund reconstruction in Ukraine
  • The imposition of sanctions has triggered a policy conversation about the potential for permanent confiscation of assets that are currently temporarily frozen under sanctions.
  • However, there are inherent limitations in using sanctions as the basis for permanent asset deprivation.
  • The response to Russian illicit finance should consider short-term and long-term foreign policy goals and desired criminal justice outcomes, and be delimited within the boundaries of the law.

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 has prompted an unprecedented surge in sanctions-based asset freezes directed at individuals linked to the Russian government. One year on from the invasion, the EU, the UK and the US all announced new packages of sanctions against Kremlin-linked individuals and those who supported its unlawful aggression against Ukraine.

The assets frozen under sanctions are passive and cannot be retrieved. There is a risk, if sanctions measures are dropped as a condition for ending

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Traders’ convictions quashed in Libor shock
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
NLJ this week: Pro bono power without the red tape
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: DNA evidence—justice on ice?
In this week's NLJ, Steven Ball of Red Lion Chambers unpacks how advances in forensic science finally unmasked Ryland Headley, jailed in 2025 for the 1967 rape and murder of 75-year-old Louisa Dunne. Preserved swabs and palm prints lay dormant for decades until DNA-17 profiling produced a billion-to-one match
NLJ this week: Small firms call for tech clarity as AI looms
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Fraud claims climb as courts brace for AI threats
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll