header-logo header-logo

14 April 2017 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7742 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

The future for the Bar

nlj_7742_samuels

Alec Samuels suggests a solution to the problems at the Bar

Society needs the Bar—a strong independent Bar. However, problems abound for the young person aspiring to join and to practise at the Bar. The cost of academic and professional training and personal maintenance is very high, leading to large debt. Professional training standards in the professional law schools vary. Finding pupillage and tenancy presents a huge challenge. Effective pupil master training can be a lottery. Less legal aid, higher court fees, and the growth of solicitor advocacy mean that there is less small work available for the young inexperienced barrister. Many young lawyers start out for the Bar, and for a variety of reasons many fall out along the line. The Bar is at risk of becoming the preserve of rich white males.

The Bar used to be self-regulatory in the public interest. Now it is controlled by the regulator, the Bar Standards Board (BSB) under the aegis of the Legal Services Board (LSB). Unfortunately the BSB disagrees with the Council of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll