header-logo header-logo

14 April 2017 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7742 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

The future for the Bar

nlj_7742_samuels

Alec Samuels suggests a solution to the problems at the Bar

Society needs the Bar—a strong independent Bar. However, problems abound for the young person aspiring to join and to practise at the Bar. The cost of academic and professional training and personal maintenance is very high, leading to large debt. Professional training standards in the professional law schools vary. Finding pupillage and tenancy presents a huge challenge. Effective pupil master training can be a lottery. Less legal aid, higher court fees, and the growth of solicitor advocacy mean that there is less small work available for the young inexperienced barrister. Many young lawyers start out for the Bar, and for a variety of reasons many fall out along the line. The Bar is at risk of becoming the preserve of rich white males.

The Bar used to be self-regulatory in the public interest. Now it is controlled by the regulator, the Bar Standards Board (BSB) under the aegis of the Legal Services Board (LSB). Unfortunately the BSB disagrees with the Council of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll