header-logo header-logo

22 January 2016 / James Ward
Issue: 7683 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Future-proofing

nlj_7683_ward

2016 is the year of the client review, says James Ward

Over the last year, private client practitioners have been awash with new laws which in some way will affect the succession planning of their clients. In 2015 alone, we had the proposed residential nil rate band, introduction of capital gains tax for non-residents, proposed changes to the domicile rules, introduction of the EU succession regulations and the proposed changes to stamp duty for second homes that has a direct impact on trust ownership. On top of this, the case of Ilott v Mitson [2015] EWCA Civ 797, [2015] All ER (D) 290 (Jul), arguably setting new precedents around the concept of “reasonable financial provision”, was relayed to the public at large.

Now comes the enviable task of digesting the implications of the various changes. With this in mind, 2016 will no doubt be the year of client review and re-assessment of their affairs. This will be particularly focused on the following:

Residential nil rate band

The introduction of this extension to the nil rate band in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Sara Mason

Bellevue Law—Sara Mason

Bellevue Law expands workplace law offering with specialist healthcare regulatory appointment

Seddons GSC—Peter Ames

Seddons GSC—Peter Ames

Seddons GSC strengthens Dispute Resolution team with partner hire

Taylor Rose—four promotions

Taylor Rose—four promotions

Taylor Rose announces partner promotions

NEWS
Pressure is mounting for a dedicated UK AI law, but deciding what it should achieve remains the central challenge
Legal professional privilege has checked the SRA’s investigative powers, exposing difficult questions about tackling suspected abusive litigation
Refusing mediation need not trigger a costs penalty, but litigators must justify their position
Group claims, disputed costs and judicial recruitment dominate the latest courtroom round-up
Landlords face fresh registration duties as procedural reforms reshape the civil courts
back-to-top-scroll