header-logo header-logo

22 January 2016 / James Ward
Issue: 7683 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Future-proofing

nlj_7683_ward

2016 is the year of the client review, says James Ward

Over the last year, private client practitioners have been awash with new laws which in some way will affect the succession planning of their clients. In 2015 alone, we had the proposed residential nil rate band, introduction of capital gains tax for non-residents, proposed changes to the domicile rules, introduction of the EU succession regulations and the proposed changes to stamp duty for second homes that has a direct impact on trust ownership. On top of this, the case of Ilott v Mitson [2015] EWCA Civ 797, [2015] All ER (D) 290 (Jul), arguably setting new precedents around the concept of “reasonable financial provision”, was relayed to the public at large.

Now comes the enviable task of digesting the implications of the various changes. With this in mind, 2016 will no doubt be the year of client review and re-assessment of their affairs. This will be particularly focused on the following:

Residential nil rate band

The introduction of this extension to the nil rate band in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll