header-logo header-logo

23 January 2020
Issue: 7871 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Futureproofing the Bar

High rents, small fees, late payments, long hours, stress and pressure are creating major concerns for barristers, according to a LexisNexis report

While the barristers surveyed for the report, ‘A brave new Bar: are barristers ready to rethink and reshape their practice’, published this week, are generally optimistic about their own prospects, many fear for the future of the Bar as a whole.

Two thirds expect to grow their practice or remain stable in the next five to seven years, and three quarters said their practice had either grown or remained stable when compared to three years ago.

However, nearly 40% of the 768 respondents cite the rising costs of doing business as a top three critical challenge. Tuition fees, living costs, rents and business rates are impinging on profitability across the profession, while nearly 30% of criminal and family barristers who do publicly funded work rate loss of income due to legal aid cuts as their most critical challenge.

Barristers worried that ‘the Bar is withering from the junior end upwards’ and that ‘certain areas of the Bar are being wiped out’.

Managing wellbeing in a high-pressure, long hours profession is another critical challenge, exacerbated by the increased use of email and smartphones during supposed leisure time. Increasing regulation and administration around data protection, money laundering and HMRC’s ‘Making Tax Digital’ scheme is adding to the burden.

Diversification into other practice areas is viewed as difficult due to lack of advice and help from others in the same set. And although direct access offers another avenue of work for the profession, only 11% of respondents currently do it.

Christopher O’Connor, head of segment marketing at LexisNexis, said: ‘There is optimism across the profession, but clearly the Bar is at breaking point.

‘How barristers operate, and approach work will have to change, for the Bar to be able to futureproof their sector within the legal profession. Chambers need to consider new tools and legal technology that can free their barristers and staff from time consuming manual tasks to reduce long working hours and open up new business development avenues.’ 

Issue: 7871 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll