header-logo header-logo

Game over

24 April 2015 / Chris Nillesen
Issue: 7649 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
nlj_24_04_15_nillesen

Termination & its consequences. Chris Nillesen reports

Probably the single most important legal concept an in-house lawyer needs to understand is contractual termination and the consequences of termination.

In the recent case of Fujitsu Services Ltd v IBM United Kingdom Ltd [2014] EWHC 752 (TCC), [2014] All ER (D) 223 (Mar) the court was asked to interpret the meaning of an exclusion clause which sought to limit the parties exposure on termination of the contract. The exclusion related to loss of profits. While the claimant sought to recover its expected loss of future income (ie profits) the respondent sought to rely on the exclusion to include the expected profits under the contract in question. It was held the exclusion of lost profits as a category of loss was “clear and unambiguous”. As a result it is important that the party expecting to make a profit under the contract ensures that this profit is not captured by an exclusion and is expressly carved out from the exclusion of liability. In some respects this is similar to the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll