header-logo header-logo

24 April 2015 / Chris Nillesen
Issue: 7649 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Game over

nlj_24_04_15_nillesen

Termination & its consequences. Chris Nillesen reports

Probably the single most important legal concept an in-house lawyer needs to understand is contractual termination and the consequences of termination.

In the recent case of Fujitsu Services Ltd v IBM United Kingdom Ltd [2014] EWHC 752 (TCC), [2014] All ER (D) 223 (Mar) the court was asked to interpret the meaning of an exclusion clause which sought to limit the parties exposure on termination of the contract. The exclusion related to loss of profits. While the claimant sought to recover its expected loss of future income (ie profits) the respondent sought to rely on the exclusion to include the expected profits under the contract in question. It was held the exclusion of lost profits as a category of loss was “clear and unambiguous”. As a result it is important that the party expecting to make a profit under the contract ensures that this profit is not captured by an exclusion and is expressly carved out from the exclusion of liability. In some respects this is similar to the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll