header-logo header-logo

The GDPR in the EEA—greater harmony or increased permitted divergence?

16 February 2018 / Liz Fitzsimons
Issue: 7781 / Categories: Features , Data protection
printer mail-detail
nlj_7781_fitzsimons

Liz Fitzsimons talks to Jenny Rayner about how EU member states are preparing for the application of the GDPR

To what extent do you think the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) will harmonise data protection laws across the European Economic Area?

At first glance, the General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) seems to offer a simple solution of a harmonised data protection law across the EU (and EEA), in place of the current fragmented data protection system which varies quite widely between member states, as each has differently implemented the current Directive 95/46/EC (the Data Protection Directive). As an EU Regulation, no local law implementation is required to adopt the GDPR, which applies direct ‘as is’ in each member state. This approach to the GDPR reduces the ability and likelihood of individual member states each creating their own slightly different version of it.

The approach taken by the GDPR also seeks to sweep away some of the current compliance obligations under the Data Protection Directive which, as locally

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll