header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
16 February 2018 / Liz Fitzsimons
Issue: 7781 / Categories: Features , Data protection
printer mail-detail

The GDPR in the EEA—greater harmony or increased permitted divergence?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_7781_fitzsimons

Liz Fitzsimons talks to Jenny Rayner about how EU member states are preparing for the application of the GDPR

To what extent do you think the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) will harmonise data protection laws across the European Economic Area?

At first glance, the General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) seems to offer a simple solution of a harmonised data protection law across the EU (and EEA), in place of the current fragmented data protection system which varies quite widely between member states, as each has differently implemented the current Directive 95/46/EC (the Data Protection Directive). As an EU Regulation, no local law implementation is required to adopt the GDPR, which applies direct ‘as is’ in each member state. This approach to the GDPR reduces the ability and likelihood of individual member states each creating their own slightly different version of it.

The approach taken by the GDPR also seeks to sweep away some of the current compliance obligations under the Data Protection Directive which, as locally

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll