header-logo header-logo

18 February 2016
Issue: 7687 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Gender pay gap warning

Employers must take action now to provide for new requirements

New requirements to publish discrepancies in pay between men and women could be used as “ammunition” for equal pay claims against private sector employers, employment lawyers have warned.

By October 2016, employers with 250 or more employees in the UK will need to publish annual reports on their gender pay gap, to comply with regulations introduced under the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015. Last week, the government published its response to its consultation, Closing the Gender Pay Gap. Further responses are due by 11 March 2016.

To comply with the new rules, it is likely that employers will need to publish the difference in mean and median pay between genders, the difference in mean bonus pay between genders, and the proportion of each gender receiving bonus pay. The data must be reported within 12 months on the company website. No civil penalties have been proposed, although non-compliant companies may be publicly named.

Andrew Taggart, partner at Herbert Smith Freehills, says: “Employers should take action now to prepare for the changes required by the regulations and be aware that pay information may be used as ammunition for equal pay claims.

“Until now, these claims have been restricted largely to the public sector where pay information is often more readily available. However, everything could be about to change and private sector employers may find they have very significant liabilities for which they have not made adequate provision.”

Paul Epstein QC, of Cloisters chambers, says: “The information employers will be obliged to publish is likely to help their current and former employees understand whether they can bring successful equal pay claims.”

Issue: 7687 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll