header-logo header-logo

Gender pay gap warning

18 February 2016
Issue: 7687 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Employers must take action now to provide for new requirements

New requirements to publish discrepancies in pay between men and women could be used as “ammunition” for equal pay claims against private sector employers, employment lawyers have warned.

By October 2016, employers with 250 or more employees in the UK will need to publish annual reports on their gender pay gap, to comply with regulations introduced under the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015. Last week, the government published its response to its consultation, Closing the Gender Pay Gap. Further responses are due by 11 March 2016.

To comply with the new rules, it is likely that employers will need to publish the difference in mean and median pay between genders, the difference in mean bonus pay between genders, and the proportion of each gender receiving bonus pay. The data must be reported within 12 months on the company website. No civil penalties have been proposed, although non-compliant companies may be publicly named.

Andrew Taggart, partner at Herbert Smith Freehills, says: “Employers should take action now to prepare for the changes required by the regulations and be aware that pay information may be used as ammunition for equal pay claims.

“Until now, these claims have been restricted largely to the public sector where pay information is often more readily available. However, everything could be about to change and private sector employers may find they have very significant liabilities for which they have not made adequate provision.”

Paul Epstein QC, of Cloisters chambers, says: “The information employers will be obliged to publish is likely to help their current and former employees understand whether they can bring successful equal pay claims.”

Issue: 7687 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll