header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
08 July 2010
Issue: 7425 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

General counsel gender gap closes

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

In-house legal teams lead the profession in ensuring a fairer deal for women and ethnic minorities.

According to research by legal recruiter Laurence Simons among 1,900 in-house lawyers, bonuses for women have been higher than those for men among in-house lawyers as a proportion of their salary in the last year.
While men command an average bonus of 10% of their salary, women can expect nearly half as much again.

However, men have greater access to senior positions and earn on average 39% more than women in the UK, compared with 30% higher in the US and 19% higher in the Eurozone.

Women account for 39% of general counsel in the UK compared to a global figure of 35%.

Naveen Tuli, managing director at Laurence Simons, says: “The greater emphasis that the legal community has had to put on diversity, thanks to initiatives such as the Diversity League Table, has seen the industry as a whole begin to address the fundamental gender imbalances we were seeing ten or 15 years ago.

“However, there is still

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Mazur and more—inside the litigation frontline

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

NLJ this week: Social media bans for children spark legal dilemmas
Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
NLJ this week: Leasehold reform risks creating ‘forgotten freeholders’
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
NLJ this week: Court of Appeal clarifies when a claim truly begins
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
NLJ this week: Split FDRs could ease pressure—and boost settlements
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll