header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
10 December 2020 / David Locke , Claire Christopholus
Issue: 7914 / Categories: Features , Professional negligence , Health & safety , National Health Service
printer mail-detail

Genetic conditions: whose secret to tell?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
34192
David Locke & Claire Christopholus question if there is a duty of care to relatives of patients with genetic conditions
  • Assessment of liability: justifying the imposition of a duty of care.
  • Discussion: establishing a new duty of care?

The maintenance of trust between patient and clinician is crucial to the therapeutic relationship, but in fact there is no absolute duty of confidentiality. However, it is quite another matter for a third party to contend that they are owed a duty of care which requires a clinician to positively breach the duty of confidentiality to their patient. Nonetheless, that was the contention in ABC v (1) St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust (2) South West London and St George’s Mental Health NHS Trust (3) Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust [2020] EWHC 455 (QB), [2020] All ER (D) 01 (Mar).

Background

The claimant’s father was convicted of manslaughter on the grounds of diminished responsibility and detained at the second defendant’s hospital under the Mental Health Act

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll