header-logo header-logo

13 May 2016 / Carrie de Silva
Issue: 7698 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Get your facts straight

nlj_7698_desilva

What exactly was Mr Paris doing in Stepney Borough Council’s garage in May 1947, asks Carrie de Silva

Throughout my years of studying and teaching law I have read a good many law reports but not, I will admit, for every case encountered, or even for every case mentioned in lectures. Paris v Stepney Borough Council [1950] UKHL 3, [1951] 1 All ER 42, was one such, and will be well known to many, if not all, readers. It involved the finding of negligence against an employer for not ensuring that a one-eyed workman in a garage wore goggles, with the consequence that he was injured in his one good eye and rendered blind (his other eye having been lost on active service in 1941). Expert witnesses opined that it was not usual industry practice for (fully-sighted) men to wear goggles in carrying out this sort of work.

The question posed was: did an employer owe a duty of care to the claimant where, while the likelihood of injury was the same as for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Flint Bishop—Charlotte Harris

Flint Bishop—Charlotte Harris

Sheffield expansion continues with appointment of commercial property partner

Browne Jacobson—Paul Duggan

Browne Jacobson—Paul Duggan

Browne Jacobson strengthens banking and finance practice with latest partner appointment Paul Duggan

Ward Hadaway—Chris Piggott

Ward Hadaway—Chris Piggott

Employment partner joins Ward Hadaway

NEWS
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

back-to-top-scroll