header-logo header-logo

10 January 2008 / Chhavie Kapoor
Issue: 7303 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property , Housing
printer mail-detail

Getting one's house in order

Will abolishing the law of forfeiture make it easier to terminate a tenancy when a tenant defaults? Chhavie Kapoor reports

The Law Commission has had reform of the law of forfeiture on its to-do list for 40 years. Its interest in the subject first manifested in 1968 with a working party. This was followed by reports in 1984, 1994 and 1998. A consultation paper was published in 2004 and this led to the 2006 report, Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default, with its appended draft Landlord and Tenant (Termination of Tenancies) Bill.

The Law Commission’s persistence is explained by its strongly held belief that the current law “is complex, lacks coherence and can lead to injustice”. This is whether viewed from a landlord or a tenant’s perspective with the possible windfall that forfeiting a lease can bring being counterbalanced by the arbi­trariness of the doctrine of waiver. This has led the Law Commission to recommend the abolition of the entirety of the current law and its replacement with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll