header-logo header-logo

Getting one's house in order

10 January 2008 / Chhavie Kapoor
Issue: 7303 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property , Housing
printer mail-detail

Will abolishing the law of forfeiture make it easier to terminate a tenancy when a tenant defaults? Chhavie Kapoor reports

The Law Commission has had reform of the law of forfeiture on its to-do list for 40 years. Its interest in the subject first manifested in 1968 with a working party. This was followed by reports in 1984, 1994 and 1998. A consultation paper was published in 2004 and this led to the 2006 report, Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default, with its appended draft Landlord and Tenant (Termination of Tenancies) Bill.

The Law Commission’s persistence is explained by its strongly held belief that the current law “is complex, lacks coherence and can lead to injustice”. This is whether viewed from a landlord or a tenant’s perspective with the possible windfall that forfeiting a lease can bring being counterbalanced by the arbi­trariness of the doctrine of waiver. This has led the Law Commission to recommend the abolition of the entirety of the current law and its replacement

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll