header-logo header-logo

10 January 2008 / Chhavie Kapoor
Issue: 7303 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property , Housing
printer mail-detail

Getting one's house in order

Will abolishing the law of forfeiture make it easier to terminate a tenancy when a tenant defaults? Chhavie Kapoor reports

The Law Commission has had reform of the law of forfeiture on its to-do list for 40 years. Its interest in the subject first manifested in 1968 with a working party. This was followed by reports in 1984, 1994 and 1998. A consultation paper was published in 2004 and this led to the 2006 report, Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default, with its appended draft Landlord and Tenant (Termination of Tenancies) Bill.

The Law Commission’s persistence is explained by its strongly held belief that the current law “is complex, lacks coherence and can lead to injustice”. This is whether viewed from a landlord or a tenant’s perspective with the possible windfall that forfeiting a lease can bring being counterbalanced by the arbi­trariness of the doctrine of waiver. This has led the Law Commission to recommend the abolition of the entirety of the current law and its replacement with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll