header-logo header-logo

01 September 2017 / David Niven , David O'Brien
Issue: 7759 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Giambrone: lessons from the mob

David Niven & David O’Brien review the lessons from Giambrone

Calabria, southern Italy. Sounds like the perfect place for your dream holiday home. Unfortunately, for the claimants in the Giambrone litigation, investing in the Jewel of the Sea development turned into a nightmare—and a protracted one at that, involving nearly 10 years of litigation.

The Court of Appeal’s judgment in Main & Ors v Giambrone & Law [2017] EWCA Civ 1193, [2017] All ER (D) 82 (Aug) provides some comfort for those individuals whose dreams have been shattered. It also provides clear lessons for solicitors on the scope of their duties and on the principles of equitable compensation. It is not, unfortunately, the end of the nightmare—Giambrone’s professional indemnity insurers AIG say there is no insurance money left for these claimants.

Giambrone & Law (a firm of solicitors then practising in England and Italy) represented the claimant purchasers on the Jewel of the Sea holiday home development in Calabria. The claimants paid unusually large deposits to Giambrone: 50% of the individual purchase prices for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll