header-logo header-logo

Going and staying

07 December 2012
Issue: 7541 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Can the court make a suspended order for possession of a dwelling by consent...

Can the court make a suspended order for possession of a dwelling by consent when a mandatory ground has been relied on by the landlord? If so, is there any restriction on the period for which a warrant of possession may subsequently be suspended?

The answer depends on the correct interpretation of s 9(2) and (6) of the Housing Act 1988. It may well be that the original order can be suspended by consent and remains valid until amended or varied on appeal in which event it will be deemed to have been made on a discretionary ground (the court being presumed to have acted lawfully) with the result that the court has a discretionary power to suspend the warrant. An alternative approach at the outset would be for a mandatory outright order to be made against an agreed undertaking by the landlord not to enforce on terms which could give rise to a contract claim by the tenant if breached.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll