header-logo header-logo

07 December 2012
Issue: 7541 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Going and staying

Can the court make a suspended order for possession of a dwelling by consent...

Can the court make a suspended order for possession of a dwelling by consent when a mandatory ground has been relied on by the landlord? If so, is there any restriction on the period for which a warrant of possession may subsequently be suspended?

The answer depends on the correct interpretation of s 9(2) and (6) of the Housing Act 1988. It may well be that the original order can be suspended by consent and remains valid until amended or varied on appeal in which event it will be deemed to have been made on a discretionary ground (the court being presumed to have acted lawfully) with the result that the court has a discretionary power to suspend the warrant. An alternative approach at the outset would be for a mandatory outright order to be made against an agreed undertaking by the landlord not to enforce on terms which could give rise to a contract claim by the tenant if breached.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll