header-logo header-logo

Going it alone

24 November 2011 / Simon Love , Tom Hunter
Issue: 7491 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

Simon Love & Tom Hunter provide a practitioner’s guide to litigants in person

Litigants in person are an ever-increasing element of our justice system. The increase in their number has been driven by the poor state of the economy, which has amplified two related issues: individuals being more likely to need access to justice (for example with matrimonial problems, debt problems), and those individuals not being able to afford a solicitor to represent them in relation to those problems.

This increase in the number of litigants in person comes at a time when the Courts Service has absorbed cuts to its budget by removing court staff, whose role previously had included the provision of basic information to litigants in person.

Lord Dyson, a Supreme Court Judge, interviewed by The Guardian, said that the appearance of more litigants in person was a big concern (25 October 2011). He said: “There are some very good litigants in person but there are an awful lot

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll