header-logo header-logo

Going it alone

24 November 2011 / Simon Love , Tom Hunter
Issue: 7491 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

Simon Love & Tom Hunter provide a practitioner’s guide to litigants in person

Litigants in person are an ever-increasing element of our justice system. The increase in their number has been driven by the poor state of the economy, which has amplified two related issues: individuals being more likely to need access to justice (for example with matrimonial problems, debt problems), and those individuals not being able to afford a solicitor to represent them in relation to those problems.

This increase in the number of litigants in person comes at a time when the Courts Service has absorbed cuts to its budget by removing court staff, whose role previously had included the provision of basic information to litigants in person.

Lord Dyson, a Supreme Court Judge, interviewed by The Guardian, said that the appearance of more litigants in person was a big concern (25 October 2011). He said: “There are some very good litigants in person but there are an awful lot

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll