header-logo header-logo

24 April 2015 / Laura Tweedy
Issue: 7649 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Going local

Laura Tweedy examines the changing scope of private sector licensing

The Housing Act 2004 (HA 2004) introduced radical changes to the regulation of the private rental market when the relevant provisions came into force in April 2006. It allowed local authorities to designate their boroughs, or parts of their boroughs, as subject to a selective licensing regime. That meant any private landlord renting properties in the designated area had to obtain a licence. The licence imposed conditions which aimed to improve the private rental market in the designated area and the local authority obtained revenue from the licence fees. Various local authority schemes have been subject to legal challenge since.

In the past month there have been three substantial changes to these licensing schemes:

  1. The fines for breach have been increased
  2. The criteria for introducing selective licensing have widened
  3. If more than 20% of an area is to be designated, special permission is needed.

Increase of criminal fines

All private landlords in the designated area must obtain a licence. If they fail to do so,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll