header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
24 April 2015 / Laura Tweedy
Issue: 7649 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Going local

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Laura Tweedy examines the changing scope of private sector licensing

The Housing Act 2004 (HA 2004) introduced radical changes to the regulation of the private rental market when the relevant provisions came into force in April 2006. It allowed local authorities to designate their boroughs, or parts of their boroughs, as subject to a selective licensing regime. That meant any private landlord renting properties in the designated area had to obtain a licence. The licence imposed conditions which aimed to improve the private rental market in the designated area and the local authority obtained revenue from the licence fees. Various local authority schemes have been subject to legal challenge since.

In the past month there have been three substantial changes to these licensing schemes:

  1. The fines for breach have been increased
  2. The criteria for introducing selective licensing have widened
  3. If more than 20% of an area is to be designated, special permission is needed.

Increase of criminal fines

All private landlords in the designated area must obtain a licence. If they fail to do so,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll