header-logo header-logo

24 April 2015 / Laura Tweedy
Issue: 7649 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Going local

Laura Tweedy examines the changing scope of private sector licensing

The Housing Act 2004 (HA 2004) introduced radical changes to the regulation of the private rental market when the relevant provisions came into force in April 2006. It allowed local authorities to designate their boroughs, or parts of their boroughs, as subject to a selective licensing regime. That meant any private landlord renting properties in the designated area had to obtain a licence. The licence imposed conditions which aimed to improve the private rental market in the designated area and the local authority obtained revenue from the licence fees. Various local authority schemes have been subject to legal challenge since.

In the past month there have been three substantial changes to these licensing schemes:

  1. The fines for breach have been increased
  2. The criteria for introducing selective licensing have widened
  3. If more than 20% of an area is to be designated, special permission is needed.

Increase of criminal fines

All private landlords in the designated area must obtain a licence. If they fail to do so,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll