header-logo header-logo

24 April 2015 / Laura Tweedy
Issue: 7649 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Going local

Laura Tweedy examines the changing scope of private sector licensing

The Housing Act 2004 (HA 2004) introduced radical changes to the regulation of the private rental market when the relevant provisions came into force in April 2006. It allowed local authorities to designate their boroughs, or parts of their boroughs, as subject to a selective licensing regime. That meant any private landlord renting properties in the designated area had to obtain a licence. The licence imposed conditions which aimed to improve the private rental market in the designated area and the local authority obtained revenue from the licence fees. Various local authority schemes have been subject to legal challenge since.

In the past month there have been three substantial changes to these licensing schemes:

  1. The fines for breach have been increased
  2. The criteria for introducing selective licensing have widened
  3. If more than 20% of an area is to be designated, special permission is needed.

Increase of criminal fines

All private landlords in the designated area must obtain a licence. If they fail to do so,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll