header-logo header-logo

The good fight

12 April 2013 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7555 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail
istock_000000103375medium

The loss of legal aid is a major cause for concern, says Jon Robins
 

Amid the fervent Jackson mania, it can feel as though the impact of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) on the already beleaguered civil legal aid scheme gets overlooked. It remains poor cousin to the wealthy (relatively speaking) claimant PI lobby or, for that matter, the criminal Bar which has friends in high places and has always proved a powerful advocate in its own cause.

It is worth remembering that if one idea underpins the sprawling LASPO monster it is the political imperative to remove £350m from the £2.2bn legal aid scheme. It does this by axing entire areas of law except where they remain protected by the requirements of the European convention on human rights. So—one more time for those that for those that haven’t been paying attention—LASPO means no more legal aid for pretty much all social welfare law and that means welfare benefits, employment, debt, immigration, plus most housing except where

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll