header-logo header-logo

08 September 2011 / Lisa Carkeek
Issue: 7480 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Good intentions?

Lisa Carkeek highlights the importance of will construction

The issue in RSPCA v Sharp & others [2010] All ER (D) 253 (Dec) was the construction of the will.
By his will, dated 19 January 2005, George Mason (the testator) divided his estate between his friends, Norman and Patricia Sharp, his brother John Mason, and the RSPCA, as follows:

“3. I GIVE the amount which at my death equals the maximum which I can give to them by this my will without Inheritance Tax becoming payable in respect of this gift:

  • as to seventy-eight percent (78%) to the said NORMAN JAMES SHARP AND PATRICIA DAPHNE SHARP as shall survive me and if more than one in equal shares absolutely
  • as to twenty-two percent (22%) to JOHN EDWARD MASON of 4 Jervis Avenue Freezywater EN3 6LT absolutely

4. I GIVE my property situate and known as 39 Malvern Road Gosport in Hampshire PO12 3LH to the said NORMAN JAMES SHARP and PATRICIA DAPHNE SHARP as shall survive me and if more than one jointly and equally

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll