header-logo header-logo

Government rapped for partisan approach to global warming documentary

18 October 2007
Issue: 7293 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

News

The use of former US vice-president Al Gore’s film, An Inconvenient Truth, in British schools has been criticised by a judge who found that it contained nine scientific errors.

The claimant, Stewart Dimmock, objected to the political message of the film, suggesting that its showing in schools amounted to “political indoctrination” as outlawed under the Education Act 1996, ss 406-407.
Dimmock’s counsel said that the showing of the film without a balancing alternative view was part of the “New Labour thought police” campaign.
 

Nicholas Hancox, a solicitor and editor of Butterworths’ Law of Education, questioned why the government would distribute copies of the film if not to influence the political opinions of the pupils who would watch it.
“Ministers have attempted to drag Mr Gore’s propaganda within the law by issuing a huge and closely written guidance note,” he says.
Following the case, the government has revised and re-issued hard-copy guidance which must identify the errors within the material to encourage informed discussion and ensure that the government is not promoting partisan views and is free from error.

Issue: 7293 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll