header-logo header-logo

11 August 2011 / Malcolm Dowden , Jen Hawkins
Issue: 7478 / Categories: Features , Environment , Property
printer mail-detail

Green dream?

Could a presumption in favour of sustainability have the opposite effect, ask Malcolm Dowden & Jen Hawkins

The government’s proposed text for a presumption in favour of sustainable development, unveiled in June, includes no definition of “sustainable development”. It merely states: “There is a presumption in favour of sustainable development at the heart of the planning system, which should be central to the approach taken to both plan-making and decision-taking. Local planning authorities should plan positively for new development, and approve all individual proposals wherever possible.”

Framed that way, the presumption appears to promise an easier ride for developers, and an increase in the number of developments, whether or not they are genuinely sustainable. However, any attempt to provide a credible definition of “sustainable development” rapidly points in the opposite direction. A presumption in favour of sustainable development might in fact mean less development in the UK, together with increased focus on the global allocation of natural resources and (possibly) a significant shift in the legal processes governing land use and spatial planning.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft strengthens Scottish real estate capabilitywith partner appointment

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints Brendan Ryan as partner in Public Law Projects team

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers welcomes five new barristers

NEWS
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
Police powers targeting concealed identities at protests come with procedural conditions that could determine whether prosecutions succeed
back-to-top-scroll