header-logo header-logo

11 August 2011 / Malcolm Dowden , Jen Hawkins
Issue: 7478 / Categories: Features , Environment , Property
printer mail-detail

Green dream?

Could a presumption in favour of sustainability have the opposite effect, ask Malcolm Dowden & Jen Hawkins

The government’s proposed text for a presumption in favour of sustainable development, unveiled in June, includes no definition of “sustainable development”. It merely states: “There is a presumption in favour of sustainable development at the heart of the planning system, which should be central to the approach taken to both plan-making and decision-taking. Local planning authorities should plan positively for new development, and approve all individual proposals wherever possible.”

Framed that way, the presumption appears to promise an easier ride for developers, and an increase in the number of developments, whether or not they are genuinely sustainable. However, any attempt to provide a credible definition of “sustainable development” rapidly points in the opposite direction. A presumption in favour of sustainable development might in fact mean less development in the UK, together with increased focus on the global allocation of natural resources and (possibly) a significant shift in the legal processes governing land use and spatial planning.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll