header-logo header-logo

11 August 2011
Issue: 7478 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Green light for Hargreaves

Wide-ranging reforms are to be introduced to copyright law, including the launch of a digital copyright exchange in the UK

Business Secretary, Vince Cable has accepted all 10 recommendations made by Professor Hargreaves in his independent review in May.

This means it will be lawful for individuals who have bought CDs and DVDs to copy their contents onto a computer or iPod, and lawful for performing artists to parody someone else’s work without first seeking copyright permission.

New licensing procedures will be introduced to release “orphan” works whose copyright owners are unknown. The law on search and analysis techniques known as “text and data mining” will be relaxed to give researchers greater access to data.

The government will announce further details of the digital copyright exchange—a digital market place where copyright licences can be readily bought and sold—later this year.

Martyn Fish, partner at HGF Law, said: “I find it difficult to see how the digital copyright exchange will work in practice—what kind of works will be covered?

“It will also be difficult to have a ‘standard’ licence for all digital copyright that can be the basis of a copyright exchange. The idea of a small claims track for IP disputes is also problematic. Just because a claim has a value of less than £5,000 does not mean that it is a straightforward case. The small claims track is just not an appropriate forum for IP disputes.”

Neville Cordell, IP partner at Allen & Overy, said: “A quiet, understated, typically British revolution in copyright law is taking place.”

While many people who make back-up copies of music, films and software will have breached copyright laws, not all home copying is infringement, said Guy Wilmot, solicitor at Russell-Cooke LLP.

“Many copyright licences for content do allow back-up copies, also breach of copyright by copying within a household is rarely if ever enforced.

“The argument is that the problem for innovation is that companies are cautious about developing technology to facilitate home back-up copying as they fear legal consequences such as being found to be a ‘secondary infringer’ (ie allowing or assisting breaches of copyright) however some caution is advised as to whether this is really an issue as the same rules never stopped double-tape decks from being sold.”

Issue: 7478 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll