header-logo header-logo

Group actions: Time to join forces? (Pt 2)

15 July 2022 / Colin Hayes
Issue: 7987 / Categories: Features , Profession , Collective action
printer mail-detail
87733
In the second of a special three-part series by Penningtons Manches Cooper, Colin Hayes considers developments on costs sharing in group actions
  • Apportionment of adverse common costs.
  • High Court declines to make an order regarding early apportionment.

With the growing popularity of group litigation, the courts are increasingly facing complex questions in regard to the apportionment of costs, both within and between claimant groups, and the extent to which the court ought to make an early determination in regard to how any costs liability is to be apportioned between such claimants.

These issues were recently considered by Mrs Justice Moulder in the cases of Upham & Ors v HSBC and Akinluyi & Ors v HSBC [2022] EWHC 227 (Comm). These cases involve two separate sets of proceedings against HSBC, one by various claimants represented by Edwin Coe (the Edwin Coe claimants) and the other by Stewarts (the Stewarts claimants). It was agreed that these cases be case-managed and heard together as there are common issues between

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll