header-logo header-logo

05 April 2012
Issue: 7509 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Growth in kid-napping

Rise in parents abducting children overseas

International child abduction cases are rising steeply year on year, a report by Lord Justice Thorpe’s office of international family justice has revealed.

As head of international family justice for England and Wales, Thorpe LJ leads a team of lawyers whose role is to offer advice and support in cross-border child-custody disputes and abductions, where a parent may have fled the country with their children.

Thorpe LJ’s office handled 27 cases in 2007, rising to 92 in 2010 and 180 last year—figures for this year suggest the numbers are still climbing.

Writing in the preface to their annual report, Thorpe LJ and Victoria Miller, the lawyer who assists him, note that: “65% of children born in London in 2010 had at least one foreign parent.

“These figures illustrate the potential for significant future growth in international family litigation.”

They lament “the often unforgivable delays in Hague Convention cases. Where judgment should be issued within six weeks, it takes on average 165 days between Brussels II bis states and 215 days where neither state was a Brussels II bis state.”

The report, published this week, cites a number of difficult cases. In one, two children brought unlawfully from Poland by their father and uncle were found living in a makeshift shelter by a live railway line in England.

The report states: “The tendency of dangerous parents to bolt when social services are exercising legitimate powers is all too common.” The office is seeing a rising number of this type of case, mostly from Eastern Europe.

Clare Renton, international family law barrister and patron of Reunite, says: “In the last 10 years there has been a great increase in international movement of labour.

“Education of lawyers overseas remains a serious problem. Many respondents have been told by local lawyers that there is nothing to stop them from bringing the children back to England without the father’s permission.”

Issue: 7509 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ling Ong, London Market FOIL

NLJ Career Profile: Ling Ong, London Market FOIL

Ling Ong, partner at Weightmans and president of London Market FOIL, discusses her biggest inspirations, the challenges of AI and the importance of tackling unconscious bias

DWF—Imogen Francis

DWF—Imogen Francis

Director and head of IP team joins in Birmingham

Penningtons Manches Cooper—five promotions

Penningtons Manches Cooper—five promotions

Firm boosts partnership and costs practice with five senior promotions

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll