header-logo header-logo

Growth in kid-napping

05 April 2012
Issue: 7509 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Rise in parents abducting children overseas

International child abduction cases are rising steeply year on year, a report by Lord Justice Thorpe’s office of international family justice has revealed.

As head of international family justice for England and Wales, Thorpe LJ leads a team of lawyers whose role is to offer advice and support in cross-border child-custody disputes and abductions, where a parent may have fled the country with their children.

Thorpe LJ’s office handled 27 cases in 2007, rising to 92 in 2010 and 180 last year—figures for this year suggest the numbers are still climbing.

Writing in the preface to their annual report, Thorpe LJ and Victoria Miller, the lawyer who assists him, note that: “65% of children born in London in 2010 had at least one foreign parent.

“These figures illustrate the potential for significant future growth in international family litigation.”

They lament “the often unforgivable delays in Hague Convention cases. Where judgment should be issued within six weeks, it takes on average 165 days between Brussels II bis states and 215 days where neither state was a Brussels II bis state.”

The report, published this week, cites a number of difficult cases. In one, two children brought unlawfully from Poland by their father and uncle were found living in a makeshift shelter by a live railway line in England.

The report states: “The tendency of dangerous parents to bolt when social services are exercising legitimate powers is all too common.” The office is seeing a rising number of this type of case, mostly from Eastern Europe.

Clare Renton, international family law barrister and patron of Reunite, says: “In the last 10 years there has been a great increase in international movement of labour.

“Education of lawyers overseas remains a serious problem. Many respondents have been told by local lawyers that there is nothing to stop them from bringing the children back to England without the father’s permission.”

Issue: 7509 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll