header-logo header-logo

Growth in kid-napping

05 April 2012
Issue: 7509 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Rise in parents abducting children overseas

International child abduction cases are rising steeply year on year, a report by Lord Justice Thorpe’s office of international family justice has revealed.

As head of international family justice for England and Wales, Thorpe LJ leads a team of lawyers whose role is to offer advice and support in cross-border child-custody disputes and abductions, where a parent may have fled the country with their children.

Thorpe LJ’s office handled 27 cases in 2007, rising to 92 in 2010 and 180 last year—figures for this year suggest the numbers are still climbing.

Writing in the preface to their annual report, Thorpe LJ and Victoria Miller, the lawyer who assists him, note that: “65% of children born in London in 2010 had at least one foreign parent.

“These figures illustrate the potential for significant future growth in international family litigation.”

They lament “the often unforgivable delays in Hague Convention cases. Where judgment should be issued within six weeks, it takes on average 165 days between Brussels II bis states and 215 days where neither state was a Brussels II bis state.”

The report, published this week, cites a number of difficult cases. In one, two children brought unlawfully from Poland by their father and uncle were found living in a makeshift shelter by a live railway line in England.

The report states: “The tendency of dangerous parents to bolt when social services are exercising legitimate powers is all too common.” The office is seeing a rising number of this type of case, mostly from Eastern Europe.

Clare Renton, international family law barrister and patron of Reunite, says: “In the last 10 years there has been a great increase in international movement of labour.

“Education of lawyers overseas remains a serious problem. Many respondents have been told by local lawyers that there is nothing to stop them from bringing the children back to England without the father’s permission.”

Issue: 7509 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll