header-logo header-logo

12 November 2009 / Katherine Walker
Issue: 7393 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

On guard!

Paying close attention to child support legislation can pay dividends. Katherine Walker explains why

The failings of the Child Support Agency (CSA) are well documented and the only advice most of us give to our clients in relation to the CSA is, where possible, to avoid it at all costs.

However, given that the statutory regime is the starting point, both for practitioners when negotiating consent orders and for the court in cases where it retains jurisdiction, it is important to be familiar with the detail of the legislation and the changes ahead.

The much heralded creation of the Child Maintenance Enforcement Commission (CMEC) has created the impression that change is occurring more quickly than is actually the case.

The Child Maintenance and Other Payments Act 2008 (CMOPA 2008) continues to build on the existing, already labyrinthine, statutory framework. The confusion over the precise division of responsibility between the old CSA and CMEC has certainly not helped matters.

In fact, although CMEC has been up and running since July 2008 and has assumed responsibility

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll