header-logo header-logo

A guide to expert accountants’ reports

08 November 2018 / George Sim
Issue: 7816 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Users of expert accountants’ reports need to subject them to critical scrutiny. George Sim explains how & why

  • Report contents – does the report do what it sets out to do?
  • Limitations on the quality of information relied upon.

Expert accountants’ reports vary considerably. Some are brief and consist largely of sets of calculations, whereas reports on large commercial cases may be lengthy and complex, with several appendices showing the detail of the expert’s calculations and providing background information.

The Civil Procedure Rules, the Criminal Procedure Rules and the Family Procedure Rules and relevant practice directions set out basic requirements for expert reports such as the requirement to provide details of experts’ qualifications. Nevertheless, solicitors and barristers will often need to assess the value of expert accountants’ reports by reference to more detailed criteria. This article identifies issues which may be important to an evaluation of an expert accountant’s report.

General points

Does the report cover the expert’s instructions?

Expert accountants generally summarise their instructions in the body of their

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll