header-logo header-logo

A guide to expert accountants’ reports

08 November 2018 / George Sim
Issue: 7816 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Users of expert accountants’ reports need to subject them to critical scrutiny. George Sim explains how & why

  • Report contents – does the report do what it sets out to do?
  • Limitations on the quality of information relied upon.

Expert accountants’ reports vary considerably. Some are brief and consist largely of sets of calculations, whereas reports on large commercial cases may be lengthy and complex, with several appendices showing the detail of the expert’s calculations and providing background information.

The Civil Procedure Rules, the Criminal Procedure Rules and the Family Procedure Rules and relevant practice directions set out basic requirements for expert reports such as the requirement to provide details of experts’ qualifications. Nevertheless, solicitors and barristers will often need to assess the value of expert accountants’ reports by reference to more detailed criteria. This article identifies issues which may be important to an evaluation of an expert accountant’s report.

General points

Does the report cover the expert’s instructions?

Expert accountants generally summarise their instructions in the body of their

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll