header-logo header-logo

08 November 2018 / George Sim
Issue: 7816 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

A guide to expert accountants’ reports

Users of expert accountants’ reports need to subject them to critical scrutiny. George Sim explains how & why

  • Report contents – does the report do what it sets out to do?
  • Limitations on the quality of information relied upon.

Expert accountants’ reports vary considerably. Some are brief and consist largely of sets of calculations, whereas reports on large commercial cases may be lengthy and complex, with several appendices showing the detail of the expert’s calculations and providing background information.

The Civil Procedure Rules, the Criminal Procedure Rules and the Family Procedure Rules and relevant practice directions set out basic requirements for expert reports such as the requirement to provide details of experts’ qualifications. Nevertheless, solicitors and barristers will often need to assess the value of expert accountants’ reports by reference to more detailed criteria. This article identifies issues which may be important to an evaluation of an expert accountant’s report.

General points

Does the report cover the expert’s instructions?

Expert accountants generally summarise their instructions in the body of their reports

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll