header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
10 June 2011 / Camilla Lovell-hoare
Issue: 7469 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Handle with care

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Camilla Lovell-Hoare examines the complexities of surrogacy

The profile of surrogacy has been raised in recent months by virtue of celebrities such as Nicole Kidman and Elton John who have had children by surrogate mothers. However, such stories fail to reveal the emotional and legal complexities surrounding surrogacy, in particular the issues faced by prospective parents who may enter into surrogacy agreements overseas, which can be a tempting option if they are unable to find a surrogate in the UK.

Parental responsibility

One of the main issues encountered by couples is who actually has parental responsibility of the child, as under domestic law the commissioning couple are not automatically the legal parents of the child.

The main legislation governing surrogacy is the Surrogacy Arrangements Act 1985 (SAA 1985), the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 (HFEA 2008), the Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Parental Orders) Regulations 2010 (SI 2010/985) (the 2010 Regs) and the Adoption and Children Act 2002 (ACA 2002).

Section 33(1) of HFEA 2008 defines the “mother” of the child as the “woman

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll