header-logo header-logo

10 June 2011 / Camilla Lovell-hoare
Issue: 7469 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Handle with care

Camilla Lovell-Hoare examines the complexities of surrogacy

The profile of surrogacy has been raised in recent months by virtue of celebrities such as Nicole Kidman and Elton John who have had children by surrogate mothers. However, such stories fail to reveal the emotional and legal complexities surrounding surrogacy, in particular the issues faced by prospective parents who may enter into surrogacy agreements overseas, which can be a tempting option if they are unable to find a surrogate in the UK.

Parental responsibility

One of the main issues encountered by couples is who actually has parental responsibility of the child, as under domestic law the commissioning couple are not automatically the legal parents of the child.

The main legislation governing surrogacy is the Surrogacy Arrangements Act 1985 (SAA 1985), the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 (HFEA 2008), the Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Parental Orders) Regulations 2010 (SI 2010/985) (the 2010 Regs) and the Adoption and Children Act 2002 (ACA 2002).

Section 33(1) of HFEA 2008 defines the “mother” of the child as the “woman

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
back-to-top-scroll