header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Handle with care

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
10 June 2011 / Camilla Lovell-hoare
Issue: 7469 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Camilla Lovell-Hoare examines the complexities of surrogacy

The profile of surrogacy has been raised in recent months by virtue of celebrities such as Nicole Kidman and Elton John who have had children by surrogate mothers. However, such stories fail to reveal the emotional and legal complexities surrounding surrogacy, in particular the issues faced by prospective parents who may enter into surrogacy agreements overseas, which can be a tempting option if they are unable to find a surrogate in the UK.

Parental responsibility

One of the main issues encountered by couples is who actually has parental responsibility of the child, as under domestic law the commissioning couple are not automatically the legal parents of the child.

The main legislation governing surrogacy is the Surrogacy Arrangements Act 1985 (SAA 1985), the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 (HFEA 2008), the Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Parental Orders) Regulations 2010 (SI 2010/985) (the 2010 Regs) and the Adoption and Children Act 2002 (ACA 2002).

Section 33(1) of HFEA 2008 defines the “mother” of the child as the “woman

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Read All
Public Accounts Committee warn of ‘extinction’ risk for legal aid
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
NLJ this week: The insider returns
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
NLJ this week: Drawing the line on contempt
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
NLJ this week: Stop and search by the numbers
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
NLJ this week: Looking back on the prorogation that never was
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll