header-logo header-logo

15 December 2011 / Alex Odell , Victoria Oakes
Issue: 7494 / Categories: Features , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Handle with care

Justice v security: has the government got the balance right? Victoria Oakes & Alex Odell review the evidence

The government’s Justice and Security green paper, which Ken Clarke introduced to the House of Commons in October, was said to be the culmination of a year’s careful consideration of “how to respond to a difficult scenario in any liberal democracy”, namely, how the courts can be best equipped to pass judgments in cases involving sensitive material.

There is cross-party support for the principles behind the paper, for which the deadline for responses is 6 January 2012. In the past decade, there has been an increase in the number of cases in which the security and intelligence agencies are involved. Unfortunately, the courts have been ill equipped to deal with this change. In drafting the green paper the government hopes to restore the nation’s faith in the ability of the agencies to keep Britain safe, while maintaining sufficient regard for the rule of law. The judiciary must be enabled to reach just conclusions in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
A landmark ruling has delivered the first judicial application of the UK’s anti-SLAPP regime and provided fresh guidance on abusive litigation
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
Non-court dispute resolution is no longer an alternative in family law—it is rapidly becoming the norm
back-to-top-scroll