header-logo header-logo

12 August 2020 / Fred Philpott , Slim Dinsdale
Issue: 7899 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Food law
printer mail-detail

Food law: Hard to swallow?

25798
Innocent but not allowed to prove it. Slim Dinsdale & Fred Philpott address a statutory fiction in criminal law

In brief

  • In the context of criminal proceedings concerning food law the High Court has held that if legislation deems a state of affairs leading to a conviction the defendant cannot adduce evidence to the contrary.

The case involved use by dates. The legislation stated that if a food product was on sale after the date it was ‘deemed to be unsafe’. There was evidence that the food products were not unsafe (the double negative is appropriate). That was ruled inadmissible and the criminal conviction was upheld.

This cannot be right

To make deeming provisions in criminal law can sometimes be justified. Often the factual situation or intention is known only to the defendant so it is right to deem a certain situation or intention from other facts but permit the defendant to show (rebut) that this situation or intention is not correct. The law which places

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll